India Banks:India’s bankruptcy law,Miles to go before we reap

类别:行业研究 机构:香港上海汇丰银行有限公司 研究员:香港上海汇丰研究所 日期:2017-07-31

In this report we outline the resolution process under the new Bankruptcy Law, theprogress it has made so far, potential uncertainties it faces and the impact it can haveon banks. We also provide some historical perspective on past measures and whythey were unsuccessful.

    The IBC (The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016) is off to a slow start. Aftermultiple delays due to court interventions initiated by borrowers, the bankruptcyprocess has now got judicial backing that can be used in future cases to preventsimilar delays. Along with the recent ordinance providing RBI powers to direct banksto initiate insolvency proceedings against borrowers (refer to our recent note on theGoI Ordinance dated 8 May 2017), the IBC is likely to quicken the pace of stressedasset resolution as the mechanism provides a definite time frame for resolution (180-270 days), beyond which the case will proceed for liquidation.

    Recent events are positive for the IBC: With the Gujarat High Court dismissingEssar Steel’s petition against its bankruptcy proceedings recently, the stage is nowset for admitting the remaining nine of the 12 cases referred by RBI to the bankruptcycourt – the NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) (refer our note (Dis)solving theNPL problem, dated 19 June 2017). While the path to resolution is filled withuncertainties expected from both the promoters’ side as well as the banks’, thecurrent resolution process appears more result-oriented than earlier efforts madeover the past 15-20 years.

    Impact on banks: The 12 large cases which are likely to be referred for bankruptcymay see resolution, in which case the potential write-off of debt could be as much as60%, or go down the path of liquidation where the write-off could be larger. For banksin our coverage universe this would imply a best-to-worst case impact of 0-6% onFY17 book value, higher for PSU banks and lower for private ones. There are somegrey areas on how minority/dissenting creditors would be dealt with in this process.

    Overall, we remain more optimistic than earlier on stressed asset resolution andrecommend ICICI Bank as the preferred way to play this theme. Our preferred playsin the sector include ICICI Bank, YES Bank and HDFC Bank (all rated Buy) given thatthe former two are at the inexpensive end of private bank valuations in our universeand the latter has higher growth along with earnings consistency.

数据推荐

投资评级

更多>>
股票名称最新评级目标价研报

盈利预测

评级选股>>
股票名称11年EPS12年EPS研报
新城控股 0 0 研报
光大嘉宝 0.60 0 研报
世联行 0.84 0.62 研报
大悦城 0.30 0.27 研报
蓝光发展 0.24 0 研报
荣盛发展 0.75 1.04 研报
绿地控股 0.55 0.30 研报
中南建设 0.80 0.99 研报
金融街 0.64 0.72 研报
新湖中宝 0.38 0.32 研报
金地集团 0.67 0.71 研报

股票关注度

更多>>
股票名称关注度平均评级最新评级
海康威视 6 持有 买入
华夏幸福 4 买入 买入
恒逸石化 4 买入 买入
南极电商 4 买入 买入
洽洽食品 4 持有 买入
贵州茅台 3 持有 买入
普洛药业 3 买入 买入
旗滨集团 3 买入 买入
喜临门 3 买入 买入
中南建设 3 买入 买入
比音勒芬 2 买入 持有
吉比特 2 持有 买入
完美世界 2 持有 买入
万科A 2 买入 买入
大悦城 2 买入 买入
美的集团 2 买入 买入
新经典 2 持有 中性

行业关注度

更多>>
行业名称关注度关注股票数买入评级数