China’s Economy:Internet Thinking Explored from An Economics Perspective

类别:宏观经济 机构:中国光大证券(香港)有限公司 研究员:光大证券(香港)研究所 日期:2014-04-14

If we are to remove the buzzwords in China, “Internet thinking” mustbe on the list. This is largely to do with the success of Xiaomi mobilephones which Ju Lei, founder of Xiaomi, has boldly attributed toInternet thinking. After Xiaomi, the public has become very interestedin Internet thinking and hopes to use it to revolutionize other sectorsand replicate Xiaomi’s success. However, what exactly is Internetthinking? So far there does not seem to have a definitive answer.

    Many simply dismiss it as a publicity gimmick or Xiaomi marketinghype.

    We believe the confusion is caused by the absence of a cleardefinition of the Internet thinking concept itself. This is exactly whatthe author is trying to explain from an economics perspective.

    In the author’s mind, Internet thinking does exist. Once the Internet isbeing used in businesses, traditional marketing models andphilosophies are revolutionized. Strictly speaking, the so-calledInternet thinking is a business model emerging from a vastcustomer base which has experienced tremendous baseexpansion and cost reduction enabled by the Internet. Theguiding principle of Internet thinking is this: “Ordinary people isking, user experience is priority, and scale is key”. Next, we shallengage the supply and demand analytical tools in economics toelaborate.

    Any given type of goods (service may also be defined as goods),may be rated differently by different users. Customers who are reallyin need of the goods will be willing to pay higher price while thosewith weak desire will only be willing to pay lower price. Therefore, asthe price of a product (or service) increases, the number ofcustomers willing to pay for it will decrease. If we translate this in agraph with price and quantity as the two axis, we will have adownward sloping demand curve that we are all familiar with. On theother hand, companies usually face increasing marginal cost. Thelarger the output, the higher the selling price required to make up forthe higher cost. Graphically, this is an upward sloping supply curve.

    The intersection of the demand and supply curves represents theactual transaction quantity and price.

    Under traditional production technologies, marginal costs ofproduction rise rapidly. This is because companies have limitedcapacities. When utilization closes to the maximum capacity,machine impairment and labour cost will drastically increase. Thismay also be a result of the companies’ limited marketing capacity sothat it needs to bear higher cost to promote the goods to morepeople. No matter what the reasons are, the endgame is that thecompanies can only serve so many customers. If we represent thisgraphically, we will have a rather steep supply curve. Theintersection of this supply and demand curves will not be too faraway from the origin. Let’s call this the “near end” of the demandcurve (Figure 1).



中国银河 卖出 11.40 研报
光大证券 中性 14.50 研报
华泰证券 买入 24.90 研报
国泰君安 买入 23.70 研报
招商证券 中性 19.20 研报
东方证券 中性 15.20 研报
海通证券 中性 15.90 研报
中信证券 中性 18.80 研报
广发证券 中性 18.90 研报
乐普医疗 持有 -- 研报
天沃科技 持有 14.00 研报


分众传媒 0 0 研报
捷成股份 1.09 0.82 研报
新华都 0.66 0.37 研报
金一文化 0 0 研报
合肥百货 0.89 0.70 研报
苏宁云商 0.70 0.59 研报
潮宏基 0.80 0.97 研报
武汉中商 0.36 0.32 研报
飞亚达A 0.42 0.42 研报
红旗连锁 0 0.87 研报
天虹股份 0.89 0.77 研报


清新环境 38 持有 持有
聚光科技 32 持有 持有
清新环境 30 持有 持有
恒瑞医药 30 持有 买入
中兴通讯 29 持有 持有
先导智能 29 持有 买入
中国国旅 28 持有 买入
万科A 28 持有 持有
启迪桑德 28 持有 买入
汇川技术 28 持有 买入
伊利股份 27 持有 持有
贵州茅台 26 持有 持有
泸州老窖 26 持有 持有
洋河股份 26 持有 持有
老板电器 26 持有 持有
聚光科技 25 持有 持有
宇通客车 25 持有 持有


电子信息 1118 120 292
生物制药 733 73 321
机械行业 725 100 259
食品行业 612 36 210
化工行业 543 70 173
酿酒行业 540 20 122
汽车制造 528 50 125
建筑建材 508 57 279
金融行业 504 31 210
交通运输 468 48 163
农林牧渔 466 38 217
煤炭行业 432 36 110
电子器件 421 72 115
房地产 410 53 149
环保行业 406 25 81
服装鞋类 378 34 120
酒店旅游 365 27 170