China’s Economy:Internet Thinking Explored from An Economics Perspective

类别:宏观经济 机构:中国光大证券(香港)有限公司 研究员:光大证券(香港)研究所 日期:2014-04-14

If we are to remove the buzzwords in China, “Internet thinking” mustbe on the list. This is largely to do with the success of Xiaomi mobilephones which Ju Lei, founder of Xiaomi, has boldly attributed toInternet thinking. After Xiaomi, the public has become very interestedin Internet thinking and hopes to use it to revolutionize other sectorsand replicate Xiaomi’s success. However, what exactly is Internetthinking? So far there does not seem to have a definitive answer.

    Many simply dismiss it as a publicity gimmick or Xiaomi marketinghype.

    We believe the confusion is caused by the absence of a cleardefinition of the Internet thinking concept itself. This is exactly whatthe author is trying to explain from an economics perspective.

    In the author’s mind, Internet thinking does exist. Once the Internet isbeing used in businesses, traditional marketing models andphilosophies are revolutionized. Strictly speaking, the so-calledInternet thinking is a business model emerging from a vastcustomer base which has experienced tremendous baseexpansion and cost reduction enabled by the Internet. Theguiding principle of Internet thinking is this: “Ordinary people isking, user experience is priority, and scale is key”. Next, we shallengage the supply and demand analytical tools in economics toelaborate.

    Any given type of goods (service may also be defined as goods),may be rated differently by different users. Customers who are reallyin need of the goods will be willing to pay higher price while thosewith weak desire will only be willing to pay lower price. Therefore, asthe price of a product (or service) increases, the number ofcustomers willing to pay for it will decrease. If we translate this in agraph with price and quantity as the two axis, we will have adownward sloping demand curve that we are all familiar with. On theother hand, companies usually face increasing marginal cost. Thelarger the output, the higher the selling price required to make up forthe higher cost. Graphically, this is an upward sloping supply curve.

    The intersection of the demand and supply curves represents theactual transaction quantity and price.

    Under traditional production technologies, marginal costs ofproduction rise rapidly. This is because companies have limitedcapacities. When utilization closes to the maximum capacity,machine impairment and labour cost will drastically increase. Thismay also be a result of the companies’ limited marketing capacity sothat it needs to bear higher cost to promote the goods to morepeople. No matter what the reasons are, the endgame is that thecompanies can only serve so many customers. If we represent thisgraphically, we will have a rather steep supply curve. Theintersection of this supply and demand curves will not be too faraway from the origin. Let’s call this the “near end” of the demandcurve (Figure 1).



先导智能 持有 42.00 研报
当升科技 买入 62.00 研报
亿纬锂能 买入 45.00 研报
雄韬股份 持有 27.00 研报
大洋电机 持有 13.00 研报
澳洋顺昌 持有 15.00 研报
亚玛顿 中性 41.00 研报
润达医疗 持有 38.50 研报
卫星石化 买入 14.04 研报
中工国际 持有 27.04 研报
中航机电 持有 26.00 研报


新野纺织 0.19 0.16 研报
亚玛顿 1.48 1.09 研报
润达医疗 0 0 研报
中工国际 1.14 1.27 研报
卫星石化 3.01 1.19 研报
中航机电 0.51 0.50 研报
先导智能 0 0 研报
亿纬锂能 0.39 0.52 研报
雄韬股份 0 0 研报
当升科技 0.25 0.07 研报


万科A 38 中性 买入
聚光科技 33 持有 买入
伊利股份 32 持有 买入
保利地产 30 持有 买入
江淮汽车 29 持有 买入
贵州茅台 29 持有 持有
宋城演艺 29 持有 持有
兴业银行 27 持有 卖出
南京银行 25 持有 卖出
金地集团 24 中性 卖出
美的集团 24 持有 持有
五粮液 24 持有 买入
亿纬锂能 24 持有 买入
泸州老窖 23 持有 买入
欧菲光 23 持有 买入
聚光科技 22 持有 买入
招商银行 22 持有 买入


电子信息 864 155 271
房地产 649 66 228
建筑建材 597 65 342
化工行业 495 91 190
机械行业 467 103 149
商业百货 464 62 179
生物制药 435 91 200
电子器件 417 96 123
煤炭行业 401 31 80
服装鞋类 398 44 190
食品行业 386 38 180
酒店旅游 370 32 251
金融行业 363 32 170
农林牧渔 332 41 130
交通运输 327 64 113
汽车制造 287 59 101
环保行业 279 25 106