China’s Economy:Internet Thinking Explored from An Economics Perspective

类别:宏观经济 机构:中国光大证券(香港)有限公司 研究员:光大证券(香港)研究所 日期:2014-04-14

If we are to remove the buzzwords in China, “Internet thinking” mustbe on the list. This is largely to do with the success of Xiaomi mobilephones which Ju Lei, founder of Xiaomi, has boldly attributed toInternet thinking. After Xiaomi, the public has become very interestedin Internet thinking and hopes to use it to revolutionize other sectorsand replicate Xiaomi’s success. However, what exactly is Internetthinking? So far there does not seem to have a definitive answer.

    Many simply dismiss it as a publicity gimmick or Xiaomi marketinghype.

    We believe the confusion is caused by the absence of a cleardefinition of the Internet thinking concept itself. This is exactly whatthe author is trying to explain from an economics perspective.

    In the author’s mind, Internet thinking does exist. Once the Internet isbeing used in businesses, traditional marketing models andphilosophies are revolutionized. Strictly speaking, the so-calledInternet thinking is a business model emerging from a vastcustomer base which has experienced tremendous baseexpansion and cost reduction enabled by the Internet. Theguiding principle of Internet thinking is this: “Ordinary people isking, user experience is priority, and scale is key”. Next, we shallengage the supply and demand analytical tools in economics toelaborate.

    Any given type of goods (service may also be defined as goods),may be rated differently by different users. Customers who are reallyin need of the goods will be willing to pay higher price while thosewith weak desire will only be willing to pay lower price. Therefore, asthe price of a product (or service) increases, the number ofcustomers willing to pay for it will decrease. If we translate this in agraph with price and quantity as the two axis, we will have adownward sloping demand curve that we are all familiar with. On theother hand, companies usually face increasing marginal cost. Thelarger the output, the higher the selling price required to make up forthe higher cost. Graphically, this is an upward sloping supply curve.

    The intersection of the demand and supply curves represents theactual transaction quantity and price.

    Under traditional production technologies, marginal costs ofproduction rise rapidly. This is because companies have limitedcapacities. When utilization closes to the maximum capacity,machine impairment and labour cost will drastically increase. Thismay also be a result of the companies’ limited marketing capacity sothat it needs to bear higher cost to promote the goods to morepeople. No matter what the reasons are, the endgame is that thecompanies can only serve so many customers. If we represent thisgraphically, we will have a rather steep supply curve. Theintersection of this supply and demand curves will not be too faraway from the origin. Let’s call this the “near end” of the demandcurve (Figure 1).



利达光电 持有 60.00 研报
大唐电信 持有 60.00 研报
中威电子 持有 40.00 研报
欣旺达 持有 40.00 研报
歌尔声学 持有 50.00 研报
大华股份 持有 60.00 研报
同方国芯 持有 70.00 研报
振华科技 持有 42.60 研报
扬农化工 买入 -- 研报
万华化学 买入 -- 研报
中国巨石 买入 -- 研报


传化股份 0.48 0.37 研报
久联发展 1.03 1.18 研报
华峰氨纶 0.22 0.12 研报
江南化工 0.75 0.64 研报
扬农化工 0.84 1.03 研报
中国巨石 0.89 0.46 研报
齐翔腾达 1.50 0.81 研报
辉丰股份 0.82 0.62 研报
安诺其 0.32 0.19 研报
沧州明珠 0.40 0.39 研报
新宙邦 1.08 0.80 研报


兴业银行 38 持有 持有
招商银行 33 持有 持有
宋城演艺 32 持有 持有
万科A 31 持有 持有
交通银行 30 持有 持有
万华化学 28 持有 买入
中炬高新 28 持有 持有
招商地产 28 持有 持有
荣盛发展 28 持有 减持
浦发银行 27 持有 持有
保利地产 27 持有 持有
华夏银行 26 持有 买入
中青旅 26 持有 持有
光大银行 26 持有 持有
平安银行 26 持有 持有
世联行 26 持有 中性
青岛海尔 25 持有 中性


电子信息 927 165 291
商业百货 859 74 331
金融行业 741 47 241
生物制药 698 108 388
房地产 638 60 190
化工行业 592 98 163
汽车制造 535 52 111
机械行业 507 103 137
酒店旅游 475 30 326
食品行业 459 42 188
农林牧渔 442 34 171
建筑建材 420 52 141
服装鞋类 407 35 117
电子器件 396 73 70
交通运输 372 53 106
煤炭行业 366 30 91
家电行业 293 22 87